linux-hardening - Re: [PATCH 5/5] fs: Convert struct file::f_count to refcount_long

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 2 May 2024 17:10:18 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Zack Rusin <zack.rusin@...adcom.com>,
	Broadcom internal kernel review list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
	David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
	Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@...ulin.net>,
	Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...ux.intel.com>,
	Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>,
	Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@...el.com>,
	Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@...el.com>,
	Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@...el.com>,
	Jonathan Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt@...el.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>,
	Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
	Nicolas Schier <nicolas@...sle.eu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] fs: Convert struct file::f_count to refcount_long_t

On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 12:41:52AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 04:21:13PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 12:12:28AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 03:52:21PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > 
> > > > As for semantics, what do you mean? Detecting dec-below-zero means we
> > > > catch underflow, and detected inc-from-zero means we catch resurrection
> > > > attempts. In both cases we avoid double-free, but we have already lost
> > > > to a potential dangling reference to a freed struct file. But just
> > > > letting f_count go bad seems dangerous.
> > > 
> > > Detected inc-from-zero can also mean an RCU lookup detecting a descriptor
> > > in the middle of getting closed.  And it's more subtle than that, actually,
> > > thanks to SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU for struct file.
> > 
> > But isn't that already handled by __get_file_rcu()? i.e. shouldn't it be
> > impossible for a simple get_file() to ever see a 0 f_count under normal
> > conditions?
> 
> For get_file() it is impossible.  The comment about semantics had been
> about the sane ways to recover if such crap gets detected.
> 
> __get_file_rcu() is a separate story - consider the comment in there: 
> 	* atomic_long_inc_not_zero() above provided a full memory
> 	* barrier when we acquired a reference.
>          *
>          * This is paired with the write barrier from assigning to the
>          * __rcu protected file pointer so that if that pointer still
>          * matches the current file, we know we have successfully
>          * acquired a reference to the right file.
> 
> and IIRC, refcount_t is weaker wrt barriers.

I think that was also fixed for refcount_t. I'll need to go dig out the
commit...

But anyway, there needs to be a general "oops I hit 0"-aware form of
get_file(), and it seems like it should just be get_file() itself...

-- 
Kees Cook