linux-hardening - Re: [PATCH][next] wifi: wil6210: Annotate struct wmi_set_link_monitor_cmd with __counted

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 13:20:06 -0600
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>, "Gustavo A. R. Silva"
 <gustavoars@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] wifi: wil6210: Annotate struct
 wmi_set_link_monitor_cmd with __counted_by()

On 3/28/24 06:57, Kalle Valo wrote:
> "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
>> Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
>> attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
>> their accesses bounds-checked at run-time via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS (for
>> array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for strcpy/memcpy-family
>> functions).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@...nel.org>
> 
> I'm dropping this because it looks like you sent a different patch, but
> it's quite hard to know for sure.

Ah yes, sorry, this was replaced by the following patch:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-hardening/ZgSTCmdP+omePvWg@neat/

Thanks!
--
Gustavo