linux-hardening - Re: [PATCH] x86, relocs: Ignore relocations in .notes section on walk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 16:45:45 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, Guixiong Wei <weiguixiong@...edance.com>,
	jgross@...e.com, mingo@...hat.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
	x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, peterz@...radead.org,
	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, tony.luck@...el.com,
	adobriyan@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, relocs: Ignore relocations in .notes section on
 walk_relocs

On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 10:56:12PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 02:40:50PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > Applied to for-next/hardening
> 
> Why?
> 
> This is a patch that should go through the tip tree, if at all.

The commit it refs to landed via -hardening, so I was taking the
responsibility of landing this fix too. But it's fine to go via
-tip if you prefer?

-- 
Kees Cook