linux-hardening - Re: [PATCH] PM: hibernate: Don't ignore return from set_memory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 20:09:24 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	"linux-hardening @ vger . kernel . org" <linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM: hibernate: Don't ignore return from set_memory_ro()

On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 10:07 AM Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 09:40:58AM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> > set_memory_ro() and set_memory_rw() can fail, leaving memory
> > unprotected.
> >
> > Take the returned value into account and abort in case of
> > failure.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
>
> More set_memory* consumers! :) Error paths look good to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>

Applied as 6.9 material, thanks!