linux-hardening - Re: [PATCH v8 0/4] Introduce mseal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2024 13:02:38 -0800
From: Jeff Xu <jeffxu@...omium.org>
To: Theo de Raadt <deraadt@...nbsd.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, 
	"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, 
	keescook@...omium.org, jannh@...gle.com, sroettger@...gle.com, 
	willy@...radead.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, usama.anjum@...labora.com, 
	rdunlap@...radead.org, jeffxu@...gle.com, jorgelo@...omium.org, 
	groeck@...omium.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, pedro.falcato@...il.com, 
	dave.hansen@...el.com, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/4] Introduce mseal

On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 9:05 AM Theo de Raadt <deraadt@...nbsd.org> wrote:
>
> Another interaction to consider is sigaltstack().
>
> In OpenBSD, sigaltstack() forces MAP_STACK onto the specified
> (pre-allocated) region, because on kernel-entry we require the "sp"
> register to point to a MAP_STACK region (this severely damages ROP pivot
> methods).  Linux does not have MAP_STACK enforcement (yet), but one day
> someone may try to do that work.
>
> This interacted poorly with mimmutable() because some applications
> allocate the memory being provided poorly.  I won't get into the details
> unless pushed, because what we found makes me upset.  Over the years,
> we've upstreamed diffs to applications to resolve all the nasty
> allocation patterns.  I think the software ecosystem is now mostly
> clean.
>
> I suggest someone in Linux look into whether sigaltstack() is a mseal()
> bypass, perhaps somewhat similar to madvise MADV_FREE, and consider the
> correct strategy.
>

Thanks for bringing this up. I will follow up on sigaltstack() in Linux.

> This is our documented strategy:
>
>      On OpenBSD some additional restrictions prevent dangerous address space
>      modifications.  The proposed space at ss_sp is verified to be
>      contiguously mapped for read-write permissions (no execute) and incapable
>      of syscall entry (see msyscall(2)).  If those conditions are met, a page-
>      aligned inner region will be freshly mapped (all zero) with MAP_STACK
>      (see mmap(2)), destroying the pre-existing data in the region.  Once the
>      sigaltstack is disabled, the MAP_STACK attribute remains on the memory,
>      so it is best to deallocate the memory via a method that results in
>      munmap(2).
>
> OK, I better provide the details of what people were doing.
> sigaltstacks() in .data, in .bss, using malloc(), on a buffer on the
> stack, we even found one creating a sigaltstack inside a buffer on a
> pthread stack.  We told everyone to use mmap() and munmap(), with MAP_STACK
> if #ifdef MAP_STACK finds a definition.
>