linux-hardening - Re: [PATCH v2] ASoC: ti: j721e-evm: Use devm_kcalloc() instead of devm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 16:33:45 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...il.com>, 
 Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, 
 Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, 
 "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>, 
 Erick Archer <erick.archer@....com>
Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, 
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ASoC: ti: j721e-evm: Use devm_kcalloc() instead of
 devm_kzalloc()

On Tue, 09 Jan 2024 19:11:01 +0100, Erick Archer wrote:
> Use 2-factor multiplication argument form devm_kcalloc() instead
> of devm_kzalloc().
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: ti: j721e-evm: Use devm_kcalloc() instead of devm_kzalloc()
      commit: be69eae9673638583cfcad44c1da6abf91efc4a3

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark