linux-hardening - Re: [GIT PULL] bcachefs updates for 6.8

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 21:35:15 -0800
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
 Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
 Neal Gompa <neal@...pa.dev>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
 linux-bcachefs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
 Nikolai Kondrashov <spbnick@...il.com>, Philip Li <philip.li@...el.com>,
 Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] bcachefs updates for 6.8



On 1/17/24 05:03, James Bottomley wrote:
> Finally testing infrastructure is how OSDL (the precursor to the Linux
> foundation) got started and got its initial funding, so corporations
> have been putting money into it for decades with not much return (and
> pretty much nothing to show for a unified testing infrastructure ...
> ten points to the team who can actually name the test infrastructure
> OSDL produced) and have finally concluded it's not worth it, making it
> a 10x harder sell now.

What will ten points get me?  a weak cup of coffee?

Do I need a team to answer the question?

Anyway, Crucible.

-- 
#Randy