linux-ext4 - [Bug 218830] lseek on closed file does not trigger an error and affect other files

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 13:24:07 +0000
From: bugzilla-daemon@...nel.org
To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 218830] lseek on closed file does not trigger an error and
 affect other files

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218830

Theodore Tso (tytso@....edu) changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |tytso@....edu
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID

--- Comment #1 from Theodore Tso (tytso@....edu) ---
This is a test/programming bug.   If you change reproduce.c so that it prints
fd_a  and fd_b, you'll see that they have the same value.   So the reason why
lseek didn't fail is because fd_a has the same integer value as fd_b --- and so
lseek didn't fail and affected the current position of fd_b.

This is a documented feature of the Linux/Unix/Posix interface.   File
descriptors are small integers, and if you close a file descriptor, it releases
that integer ---- think of it as an index in an array, i.e., struct file
*fd_array[MAX_FDS].   When you call open, it will find the first NULL pointer
in fd_array, and installs a pointer to the struct file, and returns that
integer as the file descriptor.

-- 
You may reply to this email to add a comment.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.