linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH v13 2/9] f2fs: Simplify the handling of cached insensitive names

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 10:41:10 -0400
From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...e.de>
To: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@...labora.com>
Cc: tytso@....edu,  adilger.kernel@...ger.ca,  linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
  jaegeuk@...nel.org,  chao@...nel.org,
  linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,  linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
  linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,  kernel@...labora.com,
  viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,  brauner@...nel.org,  jack@...e.cz,  Gabriel
 Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 2/9] f2fs: Simplify the handling of cached
 insensitive names

Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@...labora.com> writes:

>> Please, make sure you actually stress test this patchset with fstests
>> against both f2fs and ext4 before sending each new version.
>
> I did run the xfstests, however, maybe I did not run the full suite, or maybe I am
> running it in a wrong way ?

No worries.  Did you manage to reproduce it?

> How are you running the kvm-xfstests with qemu ? Can you share your command
> arguments please ?

I don't use kvm-xfstests.  I run ./check directly:

export SCRATCH_DEV=/dev/loop1
export SCRATCH_MNT=$BASEMNT/scratch
export TEST_DEV=/dev/loop0
export TEST_DIR=$BASEMNT/test
export RESULT_BASE=${BASEMNT}/results
export REPORT_DIR=${BASEMNT}/report
export FSTYP=f2fs

mkfs.f2fs -f -C utf8 -O casefold ${TEST_DEV}

./check -g encrypt,quick

-- 
Gabriel Krisman Bertazi