linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 2/3] ext4: fix mount parameters check for empty values

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2024 14:36:55 +0100
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
To: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@...e.de>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, 
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>, Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, 
	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, 
	Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ext4: fix mount parameters check for empty values

On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 04:30:09PM +0000, Luis Henriques wrote:
> Now that parameters that have the flag 'fs_param_can_be_empty' set and
> their value is NULL are handled as 'flag' type, we need to properly check
> for empty (NULL) values.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@...e.de>
> ---
>  fs/ext4/super.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
> index 0f931d0c227d..44ba2212dfb3 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/super.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
> @@ -2183,12 +2183,12 @@ static int ext4_parse_param(struct fs_context *fc, struct fs_parameter *param)
>  	switch (token) {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_QUOTA
>  	case Opt_usrjquota:
> -		if (!*param->string)
> +		if (!param->string)
>  			return unnote_qf_name(fc, USRQUOTA);

I fail to understand how that can happen. Currently both of these
options are parsed as strings via:

#define fsparam_string_empty(NAME, OPT) \
        __fsparam(fs_param_is_string, NAME, OPT, fs_param_can_be_empty, NULL)


So if someone sets fsconfig(..., FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "usrquota", NULL, ...)
we give an immediate

        case FSCONFIG_SET_STRING:
                if (!_key || !_value || aux) return -EINVAL;

from fsconfig() so we know that param->string cannot be NULL. If that
were the case we'd NULL deref in fs_param_is_string():

int fs_param_is_string(struct p_log *log, const struct fs_parameter_spec *p,
                       struct fs_parameter *param, struct fs_parse_result *result)
{
        if (param->type != fs_value_is_string ||
            (!*param->string && !(p->flags & fs_param_can_be_empty)))

So you're check above seems wrong. If I'm mistaken, please explain, how
this can happen in detail.