lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 13:26:22 +0100
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, 
	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/13] rcu pathwalk: prevent bogus hard errors from
 may_lookup()

On Sun, Feb 04, 2024 at 02:17:28AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> If lazy call of ->permission() returns a hard error, check that
> try_to_unlazy() succeeds before returning it.  That both makes
> life easier for ->permission() instances and closes the race
> in ENOTDIR handling - it is possible that positive d_can_lookup()
> seen in link_path_walk() applies to the state *after* unlink() +
> mkdir(), while nd->inode matches the state prior to that.
> 
> Normally seeing e.g. EACCES from permission check in rcu pathwalk
> means that with some timings non-rcu pathwalk would've run into
> the same; however, running into a non-executable regular file
> in the middle of a pathname would not get to permission check -
> it would fail with ENOTDIR instead.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ