[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2023 10:16:13 -0500
From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>,
Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Darrick J . Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
dchinner@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/7] ext4: Allocator changes for atomic write support with
DIO
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 05:10:42AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 07:46:51AM +0000, John Garry wrote:
> > It is assumed that the user will fallocate/dd the complete file before
> > issuing atomic writes, and we will have extent alignment and length as
> > required.
>
> I don't think that's a long time maintainable usage model.
For databases that are trying to use this to significantly improve
their performance by eliminating double writes, the allocation and
writes are being done by a single process. So for *that* use case, it
is quite maintainable.
Cheers,
- Ted
Powered by blists - more mailing lists