lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 22 Mar 2023 17:09:28 +0800
From:   Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@....com>
To:     Ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: A new special orphan inode 12 in ext4 only?

Hi,

Recently I observed newer mkfs.ext4 seems to create a new orphan inode 
12, with some file extents.

Which seems to have no direct parent directory, thus tools like 
btrfs-convert would also follow the ext4 inodes by creating an orphan 
inode too.

On the other hand, if I go mkfs.ext3, the mysterious inode seems to be gone.

Is this inode 12 a known special inode?
If so, how can we avoid such special inode?
(s_special_ino is still 11, thus checking against that value doesn't 
seem to help).


Some details of btrfs-convert:

It goes with ext2fs_open_inode_scan() to iterate all inodes of an ext4.

And if we hit an directory inode, we iterate the directory by using 
ext2fs_dir_iterate2() to insert the dir entries between parent and child 
inodes.

So if we hit an inode without any parent dir, an equivalent btrfs inode 
would still be created, but btrfs-check would complain about such orphan 
inode.

Thanks,
Qu

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ