linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH v1 05/14] drm/amdkfd: ref count init for device pages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 25 Aug 2021 10:34:20 -0400
From:   Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@....com>
To:     Alex Sierra <alex.sierra@....com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, rcampbell@...dia.com,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        hch@....de, jgg@...dia.com, jglisse@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 05/14] drm/amdkfd: ref count init for device pages

Am 2021-08-24 um 11:48 p.m. schrieb Alex Sierra:
> Ref counter from device pages is init to zero during memmap init zone.
> The first time a new device page is allocated to migrate data into it,
> its ref counter needs to be initialized to one.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Sierra <alex.sierra@....com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_migrate.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_migrate.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_migrate.c
> index dab290a4d19d..47ee9a895cd2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_migrate.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_migrate.c
> @@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ svm_migrate_get_vram_page(struct svm_range *prange, unsigned long pfn)
>  	page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
>  	svm_range_bo_ref(prange->svm_bo);
>  	page->zone_device_data = prange->svm_bo;
> -	get_page(page);

There is an assumption here that the page refcount is 0 because the page
should be unused. I'd add a VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page_ref_count(page), page)
here to check that assumption.

Regards,
  Felix


> +	init_page_count(page);
>  	lock_page(page);
>  }
>