lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 11 May 2020 16:59:00 +0000
From:   bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org
To:     linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 207635] EXT4-fs error (device sda3): ext4_lookup:1701: inode
 #...: comm find: casefold flag without casefold feature; EXT4-fs (sda3):
 Remounting filesystem read-only

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=207635

Christian Kujau (lists@...dbynature.de) changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |lists@...dbynature.de

--- Comment #6 from Christian Kujau (lists@...dbynature.de) ---
(In reply to Joerg M. Sigle from comment #5)
> The same person might run a kernel with casefold and/or encryption disabled
> on Tuesday. So, would it really be necessary to set their filesystem to ro -

I don't know about the inner workings of this particular issue here, but
turning the filesystem to RO when errors are encountered - isn't this what the
"error-behavior" flag controls?

$ tune2fs -l /dev/sda1 | grep ^Err
Errors behavior:          Remount read-only

Setting this to "continue" or "panic" should have avoided that whole "RO"
situation, I guess.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ