lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 21 Apr 2020 10:54:45 +0200
From:   Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:     Ted Tso <tytso@....edu>
Cc:     <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] ext4: Avoid freeing inodes on dirty list

When we are evicting inode with journalled data, we may race with
transaction commit in the following way:

CPU0					CPU1
jbd2_journal_commit_transaction()	evict(inode)
					  inode_io_list_del()
					  inode_wait_for_writeback()
  process BJ_Forget list
    __jbd2_journal_insert_checkpoint()
    __jbd2_journal_refile_buffer()
      __jbd2_journal_unfile_buffer()
        if (test_clear_buffer_jbddirty(bh))
          mark_buffer_dirty(bh)
	    __mark_inode_dirty(inode)
					  ext4_evict_inode(inode)
					    frees the inode

This results in use-after-free issues in the writeback code (or
the assertion added in the previous commit triggering).

Fix the problem by removing inode from writeback lists once all the page
cache is evicted and so inode cannot be added to writeback lists again.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
---
 fs/ext4/inode.c | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index e416096fc081..d8a9d3da678c 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -220,6 +220,16 @@ void ext4_evict_inode(struct inode *inode)
 		ext4_begin_ordered_truncate(inode, 0);
 	truncate_inode_pages_final(&inode->i_data);
 
+	/*
+	 * For inodes with journalled data, transaction commit could have
+	 * dirtied the inode. Flush worker is ignoring it because of I_FREEING
+	 * flag but we still need to remove the inode from the writeback lists.
+	 */
+	if (!list_empty_careful(&inode->i_io_list)) {
+		WARN_ON_ONCE(!ext4_should_journal_data(inode));
+		inode_io_list_del(inode);
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * Protect us against freezing - iput() caller didn't have to have any
 	 * protection against it
-- 
2.16.4

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ