lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 21 Jun 2019 19:34:36 +0000
From:   bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org
To:     linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 203943] ext4 corruption after RAID6 degraded; e2fsck skips
 block checks and fails

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203943

--- Comment #5 from Yann Ormanns (yann@...anns.net) ---
Thank you for your support, Ted. About one week before the RAID got degraded, I
created a full file-based backup, so at least I can expect minimal data loss -
I just would like to save the time it would take to copy ~22TB back :-)

Before filing a possible bug in the correct section for RAID, I'd like to
comprehend the steps you described. 
In fact e2fsck does not report inode numbers, only variables ("%$i", and so
does it for blocks, "%$b"). 
Using the the total inode count number in debugfs leads to an error:
share ~ # tune2fs -l /dev/mapper/share | grep "Inode count"
Inode count:              366268416
share ~ # debugfs /dev/mapper/share 
debugfs 1.44.5 (15-Dec-2018)
debugfs:  stat 366268416
366268416: File not found by ext2_lookup

Or did I get you wrong?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ