linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH] e2fsck: Do not to be quiet if verbose option used.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 28 Apr 2019 19:38:47 -0400
From:   "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
To:     Artem Blagodarenko <artem.blagodarenko@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, alexey.lyashkov@...il.com,
        Alexey Lyashkov <c17817@...y.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] e2fsck: Do not to be quiet if verbose option used.

On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 04:09:13PM +0300, Artem Blagodarenko wrote:
> From: Alexey Lyashkov <c17817@...y.com>
> 
> e2fsck don't print a message if 'p' option used and error can be fixed without
> user assistance,  but 'v' option asks to be more verbose, so user expect to
> see any output. But not.
> Fix this, by avoid message suppress with verbose option used.
> 
> Change-Id: I358e9b04e44dd33fdb124c5663b2df0bf54ce370
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Lyashkov <c17817@...y.com>
> Cray-bug-id: LUS-6890

I need to understand the use case of what you are trying to do here.
The preen and verbose options were never intended to be mixed and this
patch changes what the verbose flag does at a fairly fundamental
level.  I'm not sure the results will be correct and they will almost
certainly be surprising.

So (a) what is the user trying to do, and (b) what does the user want
to be trying to do?  Preen was intended to be used as part of the boot
process, when multiple e2fsck's would be running in parallel, and so
you don't *want* much in the way of verbosity.

    	  	      	     	    - Ted