lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 24 Nov 2018 12:08:18 +0000
From:   bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org
To:     linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 201685] ext4 file system corruption

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201685

--- Comment #38 from Rainer Fiebig (jrf@...lbox.org) ---
(In reply to Jimmy.Jazz from comment #37)
> @Jen Axboe
> 
> please read worth not worse in comment 33
> 
> I tried your patch for 4.19.3 and still get quite harmful ext4 errors like
> this one,
> 
> EXT4-fs error (device dm-4): ext4_xattr_ibody_get:592: inode #4881425: comm
> rsync: corrupted in-inode xattr
> 
> The filesystems were clean at boot time and the system was idle.
> 
> tune2fs ends with
> FS Error count:           64
> First error time:         Fri Nov 23 00:19:25 2018
> First error function:     ext4_xattr_ibody_get
> First error line #:       592
> First error inode #:      4881425
> First error block #:      0
> Last error time:          Fri Nov 23 00:19:25 2018
> Last error function:      ext4_xattr_ibody_get
> Last error line #:        592
> Last error inode #:       4881430
> Last error block #:       0
> MMP block number:         9255
> MMP update interval:      5
> 
> If you are interested in its dumpe2fs result let me know.
> 
> I don't use binary modules.

Jimmy,

what *I* would do if I were in your shoes is 

- run a kernel < 4.19, make sure the fs is OK and *backup important data* 
- compile 4.19.3 with CONFIG_SCSI_MQ_DEFAULT *not* set

and see what happens. If you still get corruption, CONFIG_SCSI_MQ_DEFAULT
probably is not the culprit. If not, it has at least something to do with it.

It seems that CONFIG_SCSI_MQ_DEFAULT *not* set was the default <= 4.18.19.

Others here obviously don't have problems with CONFIG_SCSI_MQ_DEFAULT=y and
kernels >= 4.19, but you never know.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ