linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH] ext4: return non-zero st

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 7 Nov 2013 22:45:04 -0500
From:	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:	Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>
Cc:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: return non-zero st_blocks for inline data

On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 03:42:32AM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> @@ -4542,9 +4551,9 @@ int ext4_getattr(struct vfsmount *mnt, struct dentry *dentry,
>  	 * blocks for this file.
>  	 */
>  	delalloc_blocks = EXT4_C2B(EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb),
> -				EXT4_I(inode)->i_reserved_data_blocks);
> +				   EXT4_I(inode)->i_reserved_data_blocks);
> +	stat->blocks += delalloc_blocks << (inode->i_sb->s_blocksize_bits - 9);
>  
> -	stat->blocks += (delalloc_blocks << inode->i_sb->s_blocksize_bits)>>9;

Why this change to the calculation to stat->blocks?

    	 	       		      - Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html