linux-ext4 - Re: [RFC 0/9] ext4: An Auxiliary Tree for the Directory Index

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 1 Jul 2013 13:40:43 +0200
From:	Radek Pazdera <rpazdera@...hat.com>
To:	Lukáš Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/9] ext4: An Auxiliary Tree for the Directory Index

On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:24:19AM +0200, Lukáš Czerner wrote:
>On Sat, 4 May 2013, Radek Pazdera wrote:
>
>> Date: Sat,  4 May 2013 23:28:33 +0200
>> From: Radek Pazdera <rpazdera@...hat.com>
>> To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
>> Cc: lczerner@...hat.com, kasparek@....vutbr.cz,
>>     Radek Pazdera <rpazdera@...hat.com>
>> Subject: [RFC 0/9] ext4: An Auxiliary Tree for the Directory Index
>
>Hi Radek,
>
>patches do not apply cleanly any more on the ext4 dev branch. Can
>you rebase and resend the whole patch set ?

Hi Lukas,

I tried the patches with the dev branch of

    http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4.git/

and they seem to apply cleanly. Is that the correct tree?

This thread contains the older version of the patches, the rebased
version should be in the thread called:

    [RFC v2 0/9] ext4: An Auxiliary Tree for the Directory Index
    http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.ext4/38697

-Radek

>Thanks!
>-Lukas
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html