linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 0/2] ext3: Reduce calling ext3_mark_inode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 01 Feb 2012 17:35:46 +0900
From:	Kazuya Mio <k-mio@...jp.nec.com>
To:	Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>
CC:	ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ext3: Reduce calling ext3_mark_inode_dirty() for
 speedup

2012/01/31 5:36, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> Can you please run this same measurement on ext4 formatted and running
> with the default options?  I'd like to know if this is still a problem
> in ext4 or not.

I performed the same measurement on ext4 with the default options.
Here is its result:

    filesystem        time(sec)  call extX_mark_inode_dirty(times)
    ---
    ext3              220.5      50,338,104
    ext3 (patched)    196.3      25,169,658
    ext4 (*1)         190.3      28,465,799
    ext4 (*2)         201.5      27,963,473
    ext4 (default)    223.3      14,026,118

    *1 disable ext4-specific options (delalloc, extent, and so on)
    *2 disable only delalloc option

Regards,
Kazuya Mio
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html