linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH] e2fsck: don't check/clone duplicate xattr blocks in fs without xattr feature

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 09 Mar 2011 15:01:32 -0600
From:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To:	ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] e2fsck: don't check/clone duplicate xattr blocks in fs
 without xattr feature

On 2/9/11 12:41 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> I had an extremely corrupted customer filesystem which, after thousands
> of lines of e2fsck output, found one more problem on an immediately
> subsequent e2fsck.  In short, a file had had its i_file_acl block
> cloned due to being a duplicate.  That ultimately got cleared
> because the fs did not have the xattr feature, and the inode
> was subsequently removed due to invalid mode.
> 
> The 2nd e2fsck pass found the cloned xattr block as in use, but
> not owned by any file, and had to fix up the block bitmaps.
> 
> Simply skipping the processing of duplicate xattr blocks on a
> non-xattr filesystem seems reasonable, since they will be cleared
> later in any case.
> 
> (also fix existing brace misalignment)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>

Ted, ping on this one?  Would like to get it upstream before
pushing it to RHEL, because as we all know now, that's how
we roll at Red Hat.  :)

Thanks,
-Eric

> ---
> 
> diff --git a/e2fsck/pass1b.c b/e2fsck/pass1b.c
> index 155fcba..2ddaeb4 100644
> --- a/e2fsck/pass1b.c
> +++ b/e2fsck/pass1b.c
> @@ -310,12 +310,14 @@ static void pass1b(e2fsck_t ctx, char *block_buf)
>  			pctx.errcode = ext2fs_block_iterate3(fs, ino,
>  					     BLOCK_FLAG_READ_ONLY, block_buf,
>  					     process_pass1b_block, &pb);
> -		if (ext2fs_file_acl_block(&inode)) {
> +		/* If the feature is not set, attrs will be cleared later anyway */
> +		if ((fs->super->s_feature_compat & EXT2_FEATURE_COMPAT_EXT_ATTR) &&
> +		    ext2fs_file_acl_block(&inode)) {
>  			blk64_t blk = ext2fs_file_acl_block(&inode);
>  			process_pass1b_block(fs, &blk,
>  					     BLOCK_COUNT_EXTATTR, 0, 0, &pb);
>  			ext2fs_file_acl_block_set(&inode, blk);
> -			}
> +		}
>  		if (pb.dup_blocks) {
>  			end_problem_latch(ctx, PR_LATCH_DBLOCK);
>  			if (ino >= EXT2_FIRST_INODE(fs->super) ||
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html