linux-ext4 - Re: Ext4: batched discard support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 23 Jul 2010 11:13:52 -0400
From:	Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
To:	"Ted Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Cc:	Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>, eshishki@...hat.com,
	rwheeler@...hat.com, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, sandeen@...hat.com
Subject: Re: Ext4: batched discard support - simplified version

"Ted Ts'o" <tytso@....edu> writes:

> On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 09:53:30AM +0200, Lukas Czerner wrote:
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> since my last post I have done some more testing with various SSD's and the
>> trend is clear. Trim performance is getting better and the performance loss
>> without trim is getting lower. So I have decided to abandon the initial idea
>> to track free blocks within some internal data structure - it takes time and
>> memory.
>
> Do you have some numbers about how bad trim actually might be on
> various devices?

I'll let Lukas answer that when he gets back to the office next week.
The performance of the trim command itself varies by vendor, of course.

> I can imagine some devices where it might be better (for wear
> levelling and better write endurance if nothing else) where it's
> better to do the trim right away instead of batching things.

I don't think so.  In all of the configurations tested, I'm pretty sure
we saw a performance hit from doing the TRIMs right away.  The queue
flush really hurts.  Of course, I have no idea what you had in mind for
the amount of time in between batched discards.

> So what I'm thinking about doing is keeping the "discard" mount option
> to mean non-batched discard.  If you want to use the explicit FITRIM
> ioctl, I don't think we need to test to see if the dicard mount option
> is set; if the user issues the ioctl, then we should do the batched
> discard, and if we don't trust the user to do that, then well, the
> ioctl should be restricted to privileged users only --- especially if
> it could take up to a minute.

That sounds reasonable to me.

Cheers,
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html