lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:24:47 +0200
From:	Valerie Clement <valerie.clement@...l.net>
To:	Alex Tomas <alex@...sterfs.com>
Cc:	ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Bad performance results with the latest git patches

Hi Alex,

running ffsb tests (large files creation) on my system with the latest 
ext4 git patches against a 2.6.23-rc4 kernel, I've got very bad 
performance results: the I/O throughput measured on an ext4 filesystem 
is ten times lower than those measured on an XFS filesystem on the same 
machine.
I have mounted the ext4 filesytem with mballoc, delalloc and 
data=writeback options.

dmesg output shows plenty of error messages like this:

EXT4-fs error (device sdc): ext4_ext_search_right: bad header in inode 
#3745797: unexpected eh_depth - magic f30a, entries 81, max 84(0), depth 
0(1)
EXT4-fs error (device sdc): ext4_ext_search_right: bad header in inode 
#3745797: unexpected eh_depth - magic f30a, entries 81, max 84(0), depth 
0(1)
EXT4-fs error (device sdc): ext4_ext_search_right: bad header in inode 
#3745797: unexpected eh_depth - magic f30a, entries 81, max 84(0), depth 
0(1)
EXT4-fs error (device sdc): ext4_ext_search_right: bad header in inode 
#3745797: unexpected eh_depth - magic f30a, entries 81, max 84(0), depth 
0(1)


If I removed the second call to ext4_ext_check_header() in the 
ext4_ext_search_right() function, the problem disappears, no more error 
messages and better throughput values close to those measured on the XFS 
filesystem.
It seems that the depth value passed in argument is buggy.

In a previous line,
   while (++depth < path->p_depth) {
the depth value is incremented even if we don't enter the loop. Is it 
the problem ?

Could you check this?
Thanks,
   Valérie
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ