lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: 19 Jun 2008 06:03:58 -0000
From: craigswright@....org
To: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: CSW Security Advisory 0002: Oral B SmartMonitor Information
 Disclosure Vulnerability and DoS

Craig Wright Security Advisory 0002
http://gse-compliance.blogspot.com 
Jun 19, 2008

I. BACKGROUND

The Oral B Triumph Toothbrush with SmartGuide™
ProfessionalCare™ 9900 is designed to enhance your brushing experience with “while-you-brush” feedback. SmartGuide is designed to ensure that you always have the best brushing experience. 

http://www.oralb.com/us/products/power/triumphsmartguide/ 

II. DESCRIPTION

Remote exploitation of an information disclosure vulnerability in Oral B’s SmartGuide management system allows attackers to obtain sensitive information.

This vulnerability exists due to a lack of authentication between the toothbrush and the monitoring device. The simple association key is easily compromised allowing the toothbrush and monitoring device to be spoofed using by a malicious attacker.

There is also a possible wireless denial of service where a malicious attacker could stop the radio feedback and monitoring.

The trashbin feature of the SmartMonitor device does not overwrite deleted data.

III. ANALYSIS

Exploitation allows an attacker to gain sensitive information from the toothbrush. No authentication is required to reach the affected application. The attacker only needs to be able to monitor the wireless transmission.

The attacker can determine the users brushing habits. It is possible to report on the location of the mouth that is being brushed and the amount of time spent on each of four defined “quantrants”. 

An attacker could also conduct a serious DoS attack. Flooding the wireless communications causes the unit to stop responding. This can result in the following actions:
A.	A continued DoS could cause the bristle monitor to not send an end of life signal to the SmartMonitor system leaving the user to continue using an old toothbrush head which could eventually lead to dental failure. The failure to monitor the most effective head life could result in bristle failure.
B. 	Dental statistics could be erased from the monitor unit. This would leave the user unable to determine and report on their brushing habits. This could lead to user confusion and over or under brushing leading to tooth wear.
C. 	Fake battery life transmissions can be sent making the user believe that the battery life is in fact longer than is truly stored. This could lead to a catastrophic brushing failure where the toothbrush runs out of power in mid-clean. A continued long term attack could lead to the creation of cavities in the user’s teeth.  

A forensic analysis of the SmartMonitor unit can be conducted to recover deleted brushing sessions. A user who was attempting to cover a period of lapsed dental care could be investigated and the deleted data recovered. In some cases it is feasible that this could result in a reduction of user privileges and possible punitive action (especially where the analysis is conducted by the parent administrative body).

IV. DETECTION

The DoS attack is readily detectable as the toothbrush fails to communicate to the monitoring unit.

Monitoring and interception remains undetectable with no known means to monitor this insidious threat to user brushing privacy.

V. WORKAROUND

The vendor has a deactivation process that will allow the toothbrush to operate manually with the radio disabled.

VI. VENDOR RESPONSE

I was unable to get an adequate result from the vendor and the receptionist did not forward the calls after the first few. A direct call to the sales channel resulted in the comment, “who the hell would want to monitor a toothbrush”.

VII. CVE INFORMATION

The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) project has not assigned a name to this issue as yet. 

VIII. DISCLOSURE TIMELINE

19/06/2008  Initial vendor notification
19/06/2008  Initial vendor response
19/06/2008  Coordinated public disclosure

IX. CREDIT

Permission is granted for the redistribution of this alert electronically

Disclaimer: The information in the advisory is believed to be accurate at the time of publishing based on currently available information. Use of the information constitutes acceptance for use in an AS IS condition.

There are no warranties with regard to this information. Neither the author nor the publisher accepts any liability for any direct, indirect, or consequential loss or damage arising from use of, or reliance on, this information.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ